buildr-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Antoine Toulme <anto...@lunar-ocean.com>
Subject Re: Installing on Ubuntu 10.10
Date Fri, 14 Jan 2011 22:02:06 GMT
Not sure we documented that yet, but rvm is a nice alternative.


On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 12:44, Alex Boisvert <alex.boisvert@gmail.com>wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 11:34 AM, Ingo Schmidt <antispam@der-ingo.de>
> wrote:
>
> > So what IS the recommended way to install buildr? And should it not
> > actually install buildr somewhere in PATH by default?
> >
>
> The instructions provided on the site _should_ install buildr somewhere on
> the PATH (during "gem install buildr").  I don't know why they don't, or
> whether this only happens in some environments.
>
> (Last time I installed buildr on my Ubuntu 10.4 system, it worked fine)
>
>
> > Is installing RubyGems from source indeed the recommended way, even
> though
> > it might work with the Debian packages?
> >
>
> 'gem install buildr' is the recommended way for those who want an easy
> install.  Installing from source involves more steps and requires
> additional
> environment dependencies.
>
> alex
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message