bval-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] conversion utilities
Date Mon, 29 Mar 2010 14:07:46 GMT
+1 that the core only contains jsr 303 + our spi

regards,
gerhard

http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces


2010/3/29 Simone Tripodi <simone.tripodi@gmail.com>

> Hi all,
> I propose to move non-jsr303 features to separate modules, as "user"
> I'd like to download the core module (with a limited number of
> dependencies) as the jsr303 implementation, then every add-on is more
> than welcome!!!
> Just my 2 cents :P
> All the best,
> Simo
>
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Roman Stumm <roman.stumm@gmx.de> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > good point. one dependency to a XML framework is enough. we can keep JAXB
> > (which is part of the JDK anyway) or use the Apache Digester, which I
> > haven't used yet.
> > XStream is only required for the non-jsr303 parts. We can remove some
> code
> > in this area (e.g. dependencies to freemarker, xstream) or do we want to
> > keep these non-jsr303 functionality?
> >
> > Roman
> >
> >> --- Simone Tripodi<simone.tripodi@gmail.com>  schrieb am Mo, 29.3.2010:
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Von: Simone Tripodi<simone.tripodi@gmail.com>
> >>> Betreff: [DISCUSS] conversion utilities
> >>> An: bval-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >>> Datum: Montag, 29. März, 2010 14:27 Uhr
> >>> Hi all guys,
> >>> during the package move, I noticed few minor points I'd
> >>> like to
> >>> discuss with you all:
> >>>
> >>> 1) a conversion utility has been (re)implemented, so I
> >>> wonder why we
> >>> don't reuse the Apache Commons BeanUtils (already in the
> >>> dependencies)
> >>> built in ConverterUtils instead of reimplementing stuff.
> >>> What do you think about it?
> >>>
> >>> 2) about the XML libraries: I noticed we've JAXB and
> >>> XStream
> >>> dependencies, since our scope AFAIK is just parsing XML,
> >>> wouldn't more
> >>> convenient, with the objective of reducing the number of
> >>> dependencies,
> >>> just use the Apache Commons Digester instead? The only big
> >>> dependency
> >>> it has is the Apache Commons BeanUtils (already in the
> >>> dependencies)....
> >>>
> >>> Sorry for the silly questions and thanks in advance for
> >>> your reply :)
> >>> All the best!
> >>> Simo
> >>>
> >>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> __________________________________________________
> >> Do You Yahoo!?
> >> Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz
> >> gegen Massenmails.
> >> http://mail.yahoo.com
> >>
> >
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message