bval-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Simone Tripodi <simone.trip...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Package naming of incoming codebase
Date Thu, 25 Mar 2010 08:44:21 GMT
Hi all guys,
if everybody agree I can take care about moving the code in the new
package, just to avoid 2 or more committers are doing the same thing
at the same time.
Please let me know and thanks a lot in advance :)
Have a nice day!!!
Simo

http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/



On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 1:05 AM, Donald Woods <dwoods@apache.org> wrote:
> OK, sounds like org.apache.bval is the overwhelming consensus, so I'll
> update the JIRA to reflect that.  Thanks everyone for your input!
>
>
> -Donald
>
>
> On 3/19/10 8:58 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
>> As part of the initial codebase bring up, we need to decide on what
>> package name we want to use in place of the current com.agimatec package
>> names.
>>
>> Either of the following would allow us to easily replace "incubator"
>> with our TLP parent at graduation, like "commons" -
>>     org.apache.incubator.beanvalidation
>>     org.apache.incubator.bval
>> or, we could keep it simple for now and worry about renaming again at
>> graduation and go with one of -
>>     org.apache.bval
>>     org.apache.beanvalidation
>>
>>
>> Thoughts?  I'll open a JIRA to use for the renaming once we decide....
>>
>>
>> -Donald
>>
>

Mime
View raw message