bval-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Donald Woods <dwo...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Package naming of incoming codebase
Date Sun, 21 Mar 2010 00:05:03 GMT
OK, sounds like org.apache.bval is the overwhelming consensus, so I'll
update the JIRA to reflect that.  Thanks everyone for your input!


-Donald


On 3/19/10 8:58 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
> As part of the initial codebase bring up, we need to decide on what
> package name we want to use in place of the current com.agimatec package
> names.
> 
> Either of the following would allow us to easily replace "incubator"
> with our TLP parent at graduation, like "commons" -
>     org.apache.incubator.beanvalidation
>     org.apache.incubator.bval
> or, we could keep it simple for now and worry about renaming again at
> graduation and go with one of -
>     org.apache.bval
>     org.apache.beanvalidation
> 
> 
> Thoughts?  I'll open a JIRA to use for the renaming once we decide....
> 
> 
> -Donald
> 

Mime
View raw message