bval-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Donald Woods <dwo...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] conversion utilities
Date Tue, 30 Mar 2010 19:13:00 GMT
Lets not start fragmenting the code too much.  The jsr303 code relies on
the bval-core code for it's metadata and validation engine.

Instead, we should look at combining the bval-jsr303 and bval-core into
a single module and then spin any "extras" off into an optional or
extensions module.


-Donald


On 3/29/10 9:34 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> Hi all,
> I propose to move non-jsr303 features to separate modules, as "user"
> I'd like to download the core module (with a limited number of
> dependencies) as the jsr303 implementation, then every add-on is more
> than welcome!!!
> Just my 2 cents :P
> All the best,
> Simo
> 
> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
> 
> 
> 
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Roman Stumm <roman.stumm@gmx.de> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> good point. one dependency to a XML framework is enough. we can keep JAXB
>> (which is part of the JDK anyway) or use the Apache Digester, which I
>> haven't used yet.
>> XStream is only required for the non-jsr303 parts. We can remove some code
>> in this area (e.g. dependencies to freemarker, xstream) or do we want to
>> keep these non-jsr303 functionality?
>>
>> Roman
>>
>>> --- Simone Tripodi<simone.tripodi@gmail.com>  schrieb am Mo, 29.3.2010:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Von: Simone Tripodi<simone.tripodi@gmail.com>
>>>> Betreff: [DISCUSS] conversion utilities
>>>> An: bval-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>>> Datum: Montag, 29. März, 2010 14:27 Uhr
>>>> Hi all guys,
>>>> during the package move, I noticed few minor points I'd
>>>> like to
>>>> discuss with you all:
>>>>
>>>> 1) a conversion utility has been (re)implemented, so I
>>>> wonder why we
>>>> don't reuse the Apache Commons BeanUtils (already in the
>>>> dependencies)
>>>> built in ConverterUtils instead of reimplementing stuff.
>>>> What do you think about it?
>>>>
>>>> 2) about the XML libraries: I noticed we've JAXB and
>>>> XStream
>>>> dependencies, since our scope AFAIK is just parsing XML,
>>>> wouldn't more
>>>> convenient, with the objective of reducing the number of
>>>> dependencies,
>>>> just use the Apache Commons Digester instead? The only big
>>>> dependency
>>>> it has is the Apache Commons BeanUtils (already in the
>>>> dependencies)....
>>>>
>>>> Sorry for the silly questions and thanks in advance for
>>>> your reply :)
>>>> All the best!
>>>> Simo
>>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> __________________________________________________
>>> Do You Yahoo!?
>>> Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz
>>> gegen Massenmails.
>>> http://mail.yahoo.com
>>>
>>
>>
> 

Mime
View raw message