bval-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] conversion utilities
Date Tue, 30 Mar 2010 13:42:41 GMT
+1

On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 4:07 PM, Gerhard Petracek
<gerhard.petracek@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 that the core only contains jsr 303 + our spi
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
>
> 2010/3/29 Simone Tripodi <simone.tripodi@gmail.com>
>
>> Hi all,
>> I propose to move non-jsr303 features to separate modules, as "user"
>> I'd like to download the core module (with a limited number of
>> dependencies) as the jsr303 implementation, then every add-on is more
>> than welcome!!!
>> Just my 2 cents :P
>> All the best,
>> Simo
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 3:27 PM, Roman Stumm <roman.stumm@gmx.de> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > good point. one dependency to a XML framework is enough. we can keep JAXB
>> > (which is part of the JDK anyway) or use the Apache Digester, which I
>> > haven't used yet.
>> > XStream is only required for the non-jsr303 parts. We can remove some
>> code
>> > in this area (e.g. dependencies to freemarker, xstream) or do we want to
>> > keep these non-jsr303 functionality?
>> >
>> > Roman
>> >
>> >> --- Simone Tripodi<simone.tripodi@gmail.com>  schrieb am Mo, 29.3.2010:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>>
>> >>> Von: Simone Tripodi<simone.tripodi@gmail.com>
>> >>> Betreff: [DISCUSS] conversion utilities
>> >>> An: bval-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> >>> Datum: Montag, 29. März, 2010 14:27 Uhr
>> >>> Hi all guys,
>> >>> during the package move, I noticed few minor points I'd
>> >>> like to
>> >>> discuss with you all:
>> >>>
>> >>> 1) a conversion utility has been (re)implemented, so I
>> >>> wonder why we
>> >>> don't reuse the Apache Commons BeanUtils (already in the
>> >>> dependencies)
>> >>> built in ConverterUtils instead of reimplementing stuff.
>> >>> What do you think about it?
>> >>>
>> >>> 2) about the XML libraries: I noticed we've JAXB and
>> >>> XStream
>> >>> dependencies, since our scope AFAIK is just parsing XML,
>> >>> wouldn't more
>> >>> convenient, with the objective of reducing the number of
>> >>> dependencies,
>> >>> just use the Apache Commons Digester instead? The only big
>> >>> dependency
>> >>> it has is the Apache Commons BeanUtils (already in the
>> >>> dependencies)....
>> >>>
>> >>> Sorry for the silly questions and thanks in advance for
>> >>> your reply :)
>> >>> All the best!
>> >>> Simo
>> >>>
>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> __________________________________________________
>> >> Do You Yahoo!?
>> >> Sie sind Spam leid? Yahoo! Mail verfügt über einen herausragenden Schutz
>> >> gegen Massenmails.
>> >> http://mail.yahoo.com
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>



-- 
Matthias Wessendorf

blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf

Mime
View raw message