bval-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Carlos Vara <bashfl...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Bean Validation 0.1-incubating Release Candidate
Date Wed, 26 May 2010 09:07:01 GMT
Hi,


> 2nd: But we really also need to take care about those nifty little
> intellectual property rules! I know this just stinks from a technical pov,
> but it's really important. And since there have been a few problems
> recently, there is currently high attention on such things.
>

You're right Mark. I didn't notice that the SPI file problem hadn't really
been solved until after sending my last message.


> Usually there are good reasons if someone votes a -1 on a release - and all
> projects I know just suspend the vote until the vetoing member either got
> convinced to recall his veto or the problem got resolved.
>

I didn't know this, seems reasonable taking into account that after a -1
vote has been placed other votes don't really make much sense.

Regards,
Carlos

--- On Wed, 5/26/10, Carlos Vara <bashflyng@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Carlos Vara <bashflyng@gmail.com>
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Apache Bean Validation 0.1-incubating Release
> Candidate
> > To: bval-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Date: Wednesday, May 26, 2010, 8:45 AM
> > Hi,
> >
> > - does "mvn rat:check" pass on the source
> > >
> >
> > After the problem with
> > javax.validation.spi.ValidationProvider has been
> > clarified, only bean-infos-json.ftl fails. I'm not familiar
> > with ftl files
> > so I don't know if they should have the license.
> >
> >
> > > - can you build the source-release.zip and svn tag
> > >
> >
> > Both build OK.
> >
> >
> > > - do all of the staged jars/zips contain the required
> > LICENSE, NOTICE
> > > and DISCLAIMER files
> > >
> >
> > bval-parent-0.1-incubating-source-release.zip contains all
> > the files.
> > Produced JARs when installing all have LICENSE and NOTICE
> > files. I think
> > they don't need the DISCLAIMER one.
> >
> >
> > > - are all of the staged jars signed and the signature
> > verifiable
> > >
> >
> > Verified signature and hashes of zip and pom files. All
> > OK.
> >
> >
> > > - is the signing key in the project's KEYS file and on
> > a public server
> > >
> >
> > It's on svn which is public for reading.
> >
> >
> > > - does the release pass the TCK
> > >
> >
> > Staged release passes incontainer and standalone tests
> > here. I also checked
> > with my project, and its test suite runs fine using this
> > version.
> >
> > So, unless "bean-infos-json.ftl" really needs the license
> > header, +1
> >
> > Good job these lasts days Donald!
> >
>
>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message