bval-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: svn commit: r1002445 - /incubator/bval/trunk/bval-tck/pom.xml
Date Fri, 01 Oct 2010 18:14:04 GMT

On Oct 1, 2010, at 12:26 PM, Donald Woods wrote:

> The current BVAL TCK from Oracle that we have to certify with is
> jsr303-tck-1.0.3.GA-dist.zip, which uses the 1.0.3.GA level of the API.
> 

Apparently I am not fully cognizant of the TCK-related aspects of the JCP process.  https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BeanValidation/JSR303+TCK
says:
  TBD - Need to ask if we must use the Sun/Oracle provided TCK for final certification testing....

Have there been further developments in this regard?  It was my impression that a spec implementation
must simply pass the TCK supplied by the spec lead.  I had no idea there was both an Oracle
TCK and a JBoss TCK.  Where I can learn more about certification as it applies to this JSR
and our efforts?

> If you look at the TCK that gets downloaded during the TCK build, those
> files also download the 1.0.3.GA level of the API and matches the
> distribution as provided by Oracle.
> 

I honestly don't see where you see this.  I don't see any indication of it in bval-tck/target/dependency/lib
or in the tck POM.

> I haven't looked at the 1.0.4 level yet, so is there something in there
> that we need?  What changes were introduced?
> 

My lack of understanding of the issues simply led me to believe that the more recent release
of the spec we could pass, the better.  In particular I had hoped that there might be a difference
in TCK versions with regard to my allegations on the incorrectness of the RI implementation
of the Path interface.

-Matt

> 
> -Donald
> 
> 
> On 10/1/10 12:37 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
>> 
>> On Oct 1, 2010, at 11:18 AM, Donald Woods wrote:
>> 
>>> Matt, the latest TCK drop from Oracle is 1.0.3, so I'd rather not move
>>> up until we have a newer TCK level that matches.....
>>> 
>> 
>> I'm fine with whatever the community decides, of course, but can you explain the
above?  I'm afraid I don't understand...
>> 
>> -Matt
>> 
>>> 
>>> -Donald
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 9/28/10 9:53 PM, mbenson@apache.org wrote:
>>>> Author: mbenson
>>>> Date: Wed Sep 29 01:53:36 2010
>>>> New Revision: 1002445
>>>> 
>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1002445&view=rev
>>>> Log:
>>>> upgrade to tck version 1.0.4.GA
>>>> 
>>>> Modified:
>>>>   incubator/bval/trunk/bval-tck/pom.xml
>>>> 
>>>> Modified: incubator/bval/trunk/bval-tck/pom.xml
>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/bval/trunk/bval-tck/pom.xml?rev=1002445&r1=1002444&r2=1002445&view=diff
>>>> ==============================================================================
>>>> --- incubator/bval/trunk/bval-tck/pom.xml (original)
>>>> +++ incubator/bval/trunk/bval-tck/pom.xml Wed Sep 29 01:53:36 2010
>>>> @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@
>>>>                <dependency>
>>>>                    <groupId>org.hibernate.jsr303.tck</groupId>
>>>>                    <artifactId>jsr303-tck</artifactId>
>>>> -                    <version>1.0.3.GA</version>
>>>> +                    <version>1.0.4.GA</version>
>>>>                </dependency>
>>>>                <dependency>
>>>>                    <groupId>org.jboss.test-harness</groupId>
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
>> 


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message