bval-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gerhard <gerhard.petra...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: svn commit: r1002445 - /incubator/bval/trunk/bval-tck/pom.xml
Date Mon, 04 Oct 2010 13:00:59 GMT
i agree with mark.

regards,
gerhard

http://www.irian.at

Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces



2010/10/2 Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>

> Oki, sorry for not being specific enough. I'll try to rephrase what I mean:
>
> If we pass the open JSR-303 TCK, then we can claim to be 'JSR-303
> compatible' and 'successfully passed the JSR-303 TCK'.
>
> But for calling us 'Sun/Oracle TCK JSR-303 certified' then we would of
> course need to go the official oracle route.
>
> makes sense?
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> --- On Fri, 10/1/10, David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > From: David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com>
> > Subject: Re: svn commit: r1002445 -
> /incubator/bval/trunk/bval-tck/pom.xml
> > To: bval-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Date: Friday, October 1, 2010, 11:04 PM
> >
> > On Oct 1, 2010, at 3:22 PM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> >
> > > isn't the JSR-303 ASL-2 licensed [1]?
> > >
> > > So I don't think we need to wait for any special
> > Oracle agreement!
> > >
> > > If you like, then I could ping Emmanuel, but usually
> > the latest TCK is available in the jboss maven repo.
> >
> > I think it makes sense to run both for now.  Since its
> > a jcp managed spec, to claim compliance, I think we have
> > to  run the tck from the official jcp channels, which,
> > unless we hear something different from Oracle, is Oracle.
> >
> > Can we put the choice of tck in a couple profiles?
> >
> > david jencks
> >
> > >
> > > LieGrue,
> > > strub
> > >
> > >
> > > [1]
> http://docs.jboss.org/hibernate/stable/beanvalidation/tck/reference/html_single/
> > >
> > >
> > > --- On Fri, 10/1/10, Donald Woods <dwoods@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > >> From: Donald Woods <dwoods@apache.org>
> > >> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1002445 -
> > /incubator/bval/trunk/bval-tck/pom.xml
> > >> To: bval-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > >> Date: Friday, October 1, 2010, 10:14 PM
> > >> Hopefully Kevan will chime in too,
> > >> but it's my understanding that we
> > >> have to pass the BVAL TCK as provided by Oracle
> > under the
> > >> Oracle/ASF NDA
> > >> in order to claim we're certified....
> > >>
> > >> During daily testing, I use the TCK files
> > downloaded from
> > >> the JBoss
> > >> repo.  Before we release the Apache BVAL
> > artifacts, I
> > >> always run the
> > >> release artifacts against the TCK as provided by
> > Oracle.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> -Donald
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 10/1/10 2:14 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>> On Oct 1, 2010, at 12:26 PM, Donald Woods
> > wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> The current BVAL TCK from Oracle that we
> > have to
> > >> certify with is
> > >>>> jsr303-tck-1.0.3.GA-dist.zip, which uses
> > the
> > >> 1.0.3.GA level of the API.
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Apparently I am not fully cognizant of the
> > TCK-related
> > >> aspects of the JCP process.
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/BeanValidation/JSR303+TCK
> > >> says:
> > >>>    TBD - Need to ask if we must use
> > the
> > >> Sun/Oracle provided TCK for final certification
> > testing....
> > >>>
> > >>> Have there been further developments in this
> > >> regard?  It was my impression that a spec
> > >> implementation must simply pass the TCK supplied
> > by the spec
> > >> lead.  I had no idea there was both an Oracle
> > TCK and a
> > >> JBoss TCK.  Where I can learn more about
> > certification
> > >> as it applies to this JSR and our efforts?
> > >>>
> > >>>> If you look at the TCK that gets
> > downloaded during
> > >> the TCK build, those
> > >>>> files also download the 1.0.3.GA level of
> > the API
> > >> and matches the
> > >>>> distribution as provided by Oracle.
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>> I honestly don't see where you see this.
> > I don't
> > >> see any indication of it in
> > bval-tck/target/dependency/lib
> > >> or in the tck POM.
> > >>>
> > >>>> I haven't looked at the 1.0.4 level yet,
> > so is
> > >> there something in there
> > >>>> that we need?  What changes were
> > introduced?
> > >>>>
> > >>>
> > >>> My lack of understanding of the issues simply
> > led me
> > >> to believe that the more recent release of the
> > spec we could
> > >> pass, the better.  In particular I had hoped
> > that there
> > >> might be a difference in TCK versions with regard
> > to my
> > >> allegations on the incorrectness of the RI
> > implementation of
> > >> the Path interface.
> > >>>
> > >>> -Matt
> > >>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> -Donald
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On 10/1/10 12:37 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> On Oct 1, 2010, at 11:18 AM, Donald
> > Woods
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>> Matt, the latest TCK drop from
> > Oracle is
> > >> 1.0.3, so I'd rather not move
> > >>>>>> up until we have a newer TCK level
> > that
> > >> matches.....
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> I'm fine with whatever the community
> > decides,
> > >> of course, but can you explain the above?
> > I'm afraid I
> > >> don't understand...
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> -Matt
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> -Donald
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On 9/28/10 9:53 PM, mbenson@apache.org
> > >> wrote:
> > >>>>>>> Author: mbenson
> > >>>>>>> Date: Wed Sep 29 01:53:36
> > 2010
> > >>>>>>> New Revision: 1002445
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1002445&view=rev
> > >>>>>>> Log:
> > >>>>>>> upgrade to tck version
> > 1.0.4.GA
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Modified:
> > >>>>>>>
> > incubator/bval/trunk/bval-tck/pom.xml
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Modified:
> > >> incubator/bval/trunk/bval-tck/pom.xml
> > >>>>>>> URL:
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/bval/trunk/bval-tck/pom.xml?rev=1002445&r1=1002444&r2=1002445&view=diff
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>
> >
> ==============================================================================
> > >>>>>>> ---
> > >> incubator/bval/trunk/bval-tck/pom.xml (original)
> > >>>>>>> +++
> > >> incubator/bval/trunk/bval-tck/pom.xml Wed Sep 29
> > 01:53:36
> > >> 2010
> > >>>>>>> @@ -92,7 +92,7 @@
> > >>>>>>>
> >
> > >>       <dependency>
> > >>>>>>>
> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > <groupId>org.hibernate.jsr303.tck</groupId>
> > >>>>>>>
> >
> > >>
> > >> <artifactId>jsr303-tck</artifactId>
> > >>>>>>> -
> >
> > >>
> > >> <version>1.0.3.GA</version>
> > >>>>>>> +
> >
> > >>
> > >> <version>1.0.4.GA</version>
> > >>>>>>>
> >
> > >>
> >    </dependency>
> > >>>>>>>
> >
> > >>       <dependency>
> > >>>>>>>
> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > <groupId>org.jboss.test-harness</groupId>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message