bval-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Bean Validation 0.3-incubating
Date Mon, 14 Feb 2011 21:12:57 GMT
I think we should continue the vote. 
We can still discuss how to treat logging in the future for the next release.

LieGrue,
strub

--- On Mon, 2/14/11, Gerhard <gerhard.petracek@gmail.com> wrote:

> From: Gerhard <gerhard.petracek@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Bean Validation 0.3-incubating
> To: bval-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Date: Monday, February 14, 2011, 8:15 PM
> hi kevan,
> 
> see the objections mentioned by mark.
> 
> regards,
> gerhard
> 
> http://www.irian.at
> 
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
> 
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> 
> 
> 
> 2011/2/14 Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com>
> 
> >
> > On Feb 9, 2011, at 2:15 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> >
> > > There have been objections. Mainly that a small
> lib like bval shouldnt
> > bring its own log layer along. java.util.logging is
> not as good as other
> > logging frameworks, but it doesn't force the user into
> just another logging
> > framework deathmatch...
> > >
> > > And as tooling for jul gets better from year to
> year, there is hardly a
> > technical argument why one should not use it today.
> >
> > I scanned the list. Can't say that I found what I
> would call "objections".
> > Seemed more like ambivalence. Anyway, if there are
> objections, let's get
> > them resolved. If there aren't, then let's move the
> vote along.
> >
> > --kevan
> 


      

Mime
View raw message