bval-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gerhard <>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Bean Validation 0.3-incubating
Date Mon, 14 Feb 2011 20:15:19 GMT
hi kevan,

see the objections mentioned by mark.


Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces

2011/2/14 Kevan Miller <>

> On Feb 9, 2011, at 2:15 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> > There have been objections. Mainly that a small lib like bval shouldnt
> bring its own log layer along. java.util.logging is not as good as other
> logging frameworks, but it doesn't force the user into just another logging
> framework deathmatch...
> >
> > And as tooling for jul gets better from year to year, there is hardly a
> technical argument why one should not use it today.
> I scanned the list. Can't say that I found what I would call "objections".
> Seemed more like ambivalence. Anyway, if there are objections, let's get
> them resolved. If there aren't, then let's move the vote along.
> --kevan

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message