bval-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Gerhard Petracek <gpetra...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Where to, Bean Validation?
Date Sat, 04 Jun 2011 11:08:12 GMT
imo they can join the effort in any case. i won't use project borders as an
argument (since we are still within the asf).

regards,
gerhard



2011/6/4 Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>

> actually if there are people over at commons interested in helping out,
> then this might be a very valuable option.
>
> However, we need to make sure that there are not too many dependencies
> pulled in into bval.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> --- On Sat, 6/4/11, Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com>
> > Subject: Re: Where to, Bean Validation?
> > To: bval-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Date: Saturday, June 4, 2011, 6:45 AM
> >
> > On May 27, 2011, at 2:07 PM, Simone Tripodi wrote:
> >
> > > Hi all guys,
> > > sorry for joining so late the discussion but I got too
> > much distracted
> > > by apache-commons :P
> > > Indeed, I think that Commons would be the perfect
> > place to host BVAL,
> > > IMHO perfectly fits as commons-validator2.
> > > Anyway I don't have any objection on proposing it as
> > TLP if the
> > > majority thinks that that's BVAL future.
> >
> > I'm pretty much in agreement with Simone. It seems the
> > majority would favor TLP, however -- which is fine, too.
> >
> > So... if the community wants to graduate, the community
> > will need to make it happen... Incubation is not a process
> > that lasts forever. We should be moving towards graduation
> > -- http://incubator.apache.org/guides/graduation.html
> >
> > --kevan
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message