bval-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Lars Francke (Commented) (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] [Commented] (BVAL-103) switch BVal from slf4j to java.util.logging
Date Tue, 27 Mar 2012 22:24:26 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BVAL-103?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13240004#comment-13240004
] 

Lars Francke commented on BVAL-103:
-----------------------------------

Hi,

sorry to jump into this without having participated in any of the previous discussions. I
personally have no problem with a dependency on SLF4J but I understand the reasoning behind
the switch to JUL. A dependency on SLF4J has the advantage of clearly documenting the logging
that a library uses.

That said it'd be very nice to have it documented somewhere that BVal can log using JUL. There
are some libraries where I only found out after quite some time that they log at all.
                
> switch BVal from slf4j to java.util.logging
> -------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: BVAL-103
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BVAL-103
>             Project: BVal
>          Issue Type: Task
>    Affects Versions: 0.3-incubating
>            Reporter: Matt Benson
>            Assignee: Mohammad Nour
>
> Team consensus seems to go that the convenience of slf4j for the bval team doesn't justify
the potential inconvenience for users, given the slight amount of logging we do.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Mime
View raw message