bval-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Benson <gudnabr...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Logging API
Date Mon, 19 Mar 2012 20:40:05 GMT
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
<nour.mohammad@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> I want to volunteer to do it I have not done anything for BVal since its
> start.
>

Great, thanks!

> As per the release of 0.4 I think this would be something we need to put it
> in there. Is there any rough estimate on when we need to cut the 0.4
> release ?

As far as I know our friends at OpenEJB want to include our next
release in a new version of TomEE, and may be blocked waiting.  In the
interest of community I'd like to give it to them ASAP, but I don't
personally consider the logging issue to be a blocker to 0.4,
depending on your schedule.

Matt

>
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 8:50 PM, Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de> wrote:
>
>> yup, jul is shitty but better than having 3rd party deps.
>>
>> +1
>>
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message -----
>> > From: Matthias Wessendorf <matzew@apache.org>
>> > To: "dev@bval.apache.org" <dev@bval.apache.org>
>> > Cc:
>> > Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 8:46 PM
>> > Subject: Re: Logging API
>> >
>> > +1
>> >
>> >
>> > On Monday, March 19, 2012, Gerhard Petracek <gerhard.petracek@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>  +1
>> >>
>> >>  regards,
>> >>  gerhard
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>  2012/3/19 Matt Benson <gudnabrsam@gmail.com>
>> >>
>> >>>  Apparently the selection of slf4j might not suit everyone.  While
I am
>> >>>  comfortable enough with its API (I prefer slf5j), it does cause us
to
>> >>>  impose downstream dependencies on our users that aren't really
>> >>>  necessary.  As an implementation of an EE specification it would
be
>> >>>  nice of us to impose dependencies, particularly ones that require
a
>> >>>  degree of manual intervention like slf4j, on our users only when
>> >>>  absolutely necessary.  We have 233 .java files in src/main folders,
>> >>>  only 10 of which contain the String "slf4j" by which I guess
>> > that we
>> >>>  are only logging a very small amount of information, in which case
we
>> >>>  might consider ourselves better citizens to simply use jul for BVal
>> >>>  regardless of how we may feel about it in the context of implementing
>> >>>  applications.
>> >>>
>> >>>  Thoughts?
>> >>>
>> >>>  Matt
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >
>> > --
>> > Sent from Gmail Mobile
>> >
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks
> - Mohammad Nour
> ----
> "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving"
> - Albert Einstein

Mime
View raw message