bval-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Matt Benson <>
Subject Re: Website status
Date Tue, 13 Mar 2012 12:42:39 GMT
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:46 AM, Roman Stumm <> wrote:
> Hi Matt,
> thanks for the new website.
> Agimatec GmbH does not exist anymore for more than a year. Could you change
> the company under "" for Roman Stumm to
> Viaboxx GmbH instead?

I will, but if you like you can change it yourself using the CMS (or
in svn).  You can read more about it at

> About the logo. I think there is no way to modify the former logo, so that
> it doesn't look like ***. Instead, how about green (=validated) beans as the
> logo or as part of the logo? I am not a graphics designer, so attached is
> just a picture to illustrate my basic idea to create logo. Maybe someone get
> inspiration from it... (The V could also be part of the word BVal ...)

Hmm, looks like the attachment didn't come through.  Maybe we should
just open a JIRA issue for discussion and to which files could be


> Roman
> Am 12.03.12 22:49, schrieb Matt Benson:
>> Hi all,
>>   The website is up at, on svnpubsub and the
>> Apache CMS (natural successor to Confluence-built sites).  The site is
>> mostly verbatim from the previous Confluence site, and there is still
>> some outstanding housekeeping to do from our old Confluence space to
>> our new (since most of the old space was just dedicated to running the
>> website, it's an open question precisely what we want to live in
>> Confluence, particularly as editing CMS content is of a similar level
>> of complexity/involvement to working in Confluence.
>> An outstanding issue, should anyone feel up to tackling it, is making
>> the cross-domain REST call to to get our blog entries
>> onto the BVal index page.  The code is present but my limited JS-fu
>> has not yet found a palatable way to make the call.  Confluence's REST
>> API doesn't seem to handle json-p, and while js guru Werner Punz has
>> suggested using an iframe I've been too lazy/stubborn yet to attempt
>> it.
>> Finally, can we *please* come to some sort of agreement on a direction
>> for a new logo?  ;)
>> Matt

View raw message