bval-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] moving the bval-guice module efforts from Apache BVal to Apache Onami
Date Sun, 10 Feb 2013 19:00:25 GMT
+1

the next bunch of work waiting to be done is the work for the BeanValidation-1.1 specification.
And this will take a bit.


LieGrue,
strub




----- Original Message -----
> From: Matt Benson <gudnabrsam@gmail.com>
> To: dev@bval.apache.org
> Cc: dev@onami.incubator.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 10:51 PM
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] moving the bval-guice module efforts from Apache BVal to Apache
Onami
> 
> Hi Simo,
>   We could wait until Onami is ready to do a release, just to ensure
> continuity.  That said, BVal probably won't have another release in the
> next month or more, so it's probably not a big deal if we go ahead and
> remove the module now, either.
> 
> Matt
> 
> 
> On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Simone Tripodi 
> <simonetripodi@apache.org>wrote:
> 
>>  Hi all again guys,
>> 
>>  no objections have been shown so I am going to create the Validator
>>  component on Onami JIRA space and copying the module from BVal.
>> 
>>  @Matt: what's next on BVal? Do we want to (re)move that module from
>>  trunk? Just let me know, I can help there.
>> 
>>  Many thanks all for the feedbacks,
>>  -Simo
>> 
>>  http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>>  http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
>>  http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
>>  http://www.99soft.org/
>> 
>> 
>>  On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:38 PM, Simone Tripodi
>>  <simonetripodi@apache.org> wrote:
>>  > Hi all BVal friends,
>>  >
>>  > recently we setup a new Incubator Podling called Apache Onami which is
>>  > focused on developing and maintaining a set of Google Guice extensions
>>  > - in our modest opinion the bval-guice would fit much better in Onami
>>  > community where it would be easier involve committers in the
>>  > development.
>>  >
>>  > We would like to propose a "move" from BVal to Onami, it 
> could be
>>  > easily done by a `svn cp` and continue the development in the Onami
>>  > fork.
>>  >
>>  > What do you think guys? Does it sound something reasonable? Do you see
>>  > any potential issue?
>>  > Many thanks in advance, all the best!
>>  > -Simo
>>  >
>>  > http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
>>  > http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
>>  > http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
>>  > http://www.99soft.org/
>> 
> 

Mime
View raw message