bval-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Albert Lee <allee8...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: release 1.1 in 2.0.0-alpha tomorrow?
Date Wed, 20 Nov 2013 14:37:24 GMT
I agree.  It would be nice to keep the implementation version same as the
spec version.

However I also understand in some particular scenario, semantics versioning
is required that cause deviation from this naming scheme.


Albert.


On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 6:42 AM, Matt Benson <gudnabrsam@gmail.com> wrote:

> I am personally in favor of the alpha release but not of the 2.x
> versioning. My preference is to manage our versions as does Apache MyFaces,
> in basic synch with the implemented specification version. This makes it
> quite simple for users to know what they're getting, IMHO. I'd like to find
> a group consensus on this issue in any case.
>
> br,
> Matt
> On Nov 20, 2013 6:21 AM, "Romain Manni-Bucau" <rmannibucau@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > Any issue if I try (help would be appreciated if yes) to release bval
> > 1.1 branch in alpha (I'll update version to 2.0.0-alpha1) tomorrow?
> >
> > Romain Manni-Bucau
> > Twitter: @rmannibucau
> > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
> > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
> > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
> >
>



-- 
Albert Lee.

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message