bval-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Location of validation.xml
Date Wed, 19 Mar 2014 15:28:01 GMT
Actually I'd expect the SPI to give the processed instance and not the
location. That's why i sugegsted to wait a bit for it to see the real
need.


Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau



2014-03-19 16:10 GMT+01:00 Michael Blyakher <michael.blyakher@gmail.com>:
> How would an SPI like this work? Would it allow the EE server to specify
> the location of the validation.xml (maybe in the form of an InputStream)?
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> <rmannibucau@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> tomee parses it itself and then create the configuration itself. I
>> think we can wait tomee starts javaee7 to write it since it should be
>> very soon (when next release is done) and it would be the main and
>> more demanding user.
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>>
>>
>> 2014-03-18 19:42 GMT+01:00 Matt Benson <mbenson@apache.org>:
>> > On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Michael Blyakher
>> > <michael.blyakher@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> Hi All,
>> >>
>> >> Thanks for the quick replies, and apologies for not being more specific
>> - I
>> >> was quoting the EE 7 Platform spec as I am particularly interested in
>> using
>> >> the bval 1.1 implementation that hasn't been officially released yet.
>> >>
>> >> But from what I am hearing, it is the responsibility of an EE server to
>> >> handle the WEB-INF case. I can see how this is possible for the 1.0
>> >> implementation, as the server can parse the validation.xml itself and
>> >> bootstrap the configuration through the validation spec API's. How would
>> >> this be done for the current 1.1 implementation in the bval-1.1 branch
>> in
>> >> the repository? I don't see how the values for the
>> "executable-validation"
>> >> element could be provided to the impl through the validation spec API's.
>> >>
>> >
>> > Well, the
>> http://bval.apache.org/mvnsite/bval-jsr303/apidocs/org/apache/bval/jsr303/ApacheValidatorConfiguration.Properties.html#VALIDATION_XML_PATH
>> > property can be used to point to a different resource on the
>> > classpath, but I can't find any mechanism that could be used to hook
>> > up WEB-INF/validation.xml, and I can't find how TomEE does it, so
>> > AFAICT you have indeed found what I consider a problem. Off the top of
>> > my head I think we could solve it by adding a simple SPI to discover
>> > the default validation configuration resource. Thoughts?
>> >
>> > Matt
>> >
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Michael
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 12:13 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
>> >> <rmannibucau@gmail.com>wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Hi
>> >>>
>> >>> Bval only looks in META-INF but TomEE for instance (more generally EE
>> >>> servers) handles WEB-INF case.
>> >>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> >>> Twitter: @rmannibucau
>> >>> Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
>> >>> LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
>> >>> Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> 2014-03-18 17:50 GMT+01:00 Michael Blyakher <
>> michael.blyakher@gmail.com>:
>> >>> > Hi,
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Where is the validation.xml supposed to be for a web archive? The
>> bval
>> >>> > spec's only indicate the "META-INF/validation.xml" location, but
the
>> EE
>> >>> > platform spec indicates that for a web archive this location must
be
>> >>> > "WEB-INF/validation.xml".
>> >>> >
>> >>> > EE.5.17 - "The name of the descriptor is WEB-INF/validation.xml
for
>> web
>> >>> > modules and META-INF/validation.xml for all other types of modules."
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Given this, I don't see anywhere in the bval 1.0 or 1.1 code that
>> handles
>> >>> > this. Am I missing something or does this implementation not handle
>> this
>> >>> > case for web archives?
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Thanks,
>> >>> > Michael
>> >>>
>>

Mime
View raw message