bval-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de.INVALID>
Subject Re: BVal 2.0 TCK work
Date Sat, 05 May 2018 08:40:06 GMT
Thanks so much for your work, Matt!

I gonna update TomEE8 to the latest bval-2 snapshot!

LieGrue,
strub

> Am 19.04.2018 um 16:55 schrieb Matt Benson <gudnabrsam@gmail.com>:
> 
> Thanks Romain--that seems to have done it! We are green. :)
> 
> Matt
> 
> On Thu, Apr 19, 2018 at 3:17 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> Pushed an (hopefully) fix, no issue to revert if it didn't help - I didnt
>> patch the tck so there is still a small "?" to have some regression.
>> 
>> 
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
>> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
>> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/
>> rmannibucau> |
>> LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
>> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-
>> ee-8-high-performance>
>> 
>> 2018-04-19 8:42 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com>:
>> 
>>> Will try to check today
>>> 
>>> Le 19 avr. 2018 00:26, "Matt Benson" <mbenson@apache.org> a écrit :
>>> 
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>  As of a few minutes ago our bv2 branch passes the 2.0 branch of the
>> TCK
>>>> with the PR from BVTCK-205 built in... with the exception of a single
>>>> test, org.hibernate.beanvalidation.tck.tests.bootstrap.BootstrapCo
>>>> nfigurationTest.
>>>> What seems to be happening here is that our CDI extension is more eager
>>>> than the TCK wants it to be: if no one has injected the default
>>>> ValidatorFactory or its Validator, the test seems to rely on the
>>>> extension's not attempting to instantiate it. My CDI-fu is pretty weak
>> if
>>>> anybody else wants to have a look at this.
>>>> 
>>>> Matt
>>>> 
>>> 
>> 


Mime
View raw message