bval-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Potential regression in 2.0.2
Date Tue, 14 May 2019 08:19:25 GMT
Hi David,

I guess this is because we don't browse the whole model and 100% use CDI
annotated model to detect constraints. @ValidateOnExecution on the impl
will likely solve it in the example.

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>


Le mar. 14 mai 2019 à 09:19, David Blevins <david.blevins@gmail.com> a
écrit :

> Hi All,
>
> I attempted to upgrade TomEE to the latest BVal 2.0.x code and noticed one
> potential regression that affects this example:
>
>  -
> https://github.com/apache/tomee/tree/master/examples/bean-validation-design-by-contract
>
> I did a git bisect to pinpoint the exact BVal commit that causes the
> example to fail:
>
> -
> https://github.com/apache/bval/commit/5bca3a73ae798d0671f964448b6e590d9bae396d
>
> Everything before that is fine.  There and after is the issue.
>
> I'd roll up my sleeves and dig, but I'll unlikely have any time till later
> next week.
>
>
> --
> David Blevins
> http://twitter.com/dblevins
> http://www.tomitribe.com
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message