bval-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Blevins <david.blev...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: BVAL-174 Return Parameter Validation Ignore void methods
Date Tue, 21 May 2019 20:18:26 GMT
Awesome.

To critique my own PR, I probably need a test case in there :)  I was kind of in a rush and
cut a corner I shouldn't have.

Regardless, general thoughts are great.


-- 
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com

> On May 21, 2019, at 1:00 PM, Thomas Andraschko <andraschko.thomas@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi david,
> 
> I will review it tommorow :)
> 
> David Blevins <david.blevins@gmail.com> schrieb am Di., 21. Mai 2019, 21:43:
> 
>> Hi All!
>> 
>> I'm personally open to any of the proposed resolutions of BVAL-175.  More
>> important for me would be BVAL-174 as it blocks this feature:
>> 
>> - http://tomee.apache.org/tomee-8.0/examples/mp-jwt-bean-validation.html
>> <http://tomee.apache.org/tomee-8.0/examples/mp-jwt-bean-validation.html>
>> 
>> Any chance this PR could be reviewed?
>> 
>> - https://github.com/apache/bval/pull/3 <
>> https://github.com/apache/bval/pull/3>
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> David Blevins
>> http://twitter.com/dblevins
>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> 
>> 


Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message