From dev-return-1657-apmail-calcite-dev-archive=calcite.apache.org@calcite.incubator.apache.org Tue Aug 11 21:59:43 2015 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-calcite-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-calcite-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6926F1881F for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 21:59:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65174 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2015 21:59:40 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-calcite-dev-archive@calcite.apache.org Received: (qmail 65114 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2015 21:59:40 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@calcite.incubator.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@calcite.incubator.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@calcite.incubator.apache.org Received: (qmail 65102 invoked by uid 99); 11 Aug 2015 21:59:39 -0000 Received: from Unknown (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 21:59:39 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 8CFF818193D for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 21:59:39 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 0.65 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.65 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, KAM_INFOUSMEBIZ=0.75, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx1-us-west.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bb-pkwVc1juu for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 21:59:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qg0-f50.google.com (mail-qg0-f50.google.com [209.85.192.50]) by mx1-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx1-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTPS id BF28720FD3 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 21:59:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qgj62 with SMTP id 62so124712613qgj.2 for ; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 14:59:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ACn0NMSBUQ2DU/+O3AlSajFWi3+Uv3wzGEJ8WeZDxd0=; b=ZccIk+z4RPLUkcibKRoTeMQJnVjZE1u/D7WN7A2HTxjpRzhOifPIMdFxsnq/xEPd4I lN3FtN+yGHE3DdxgyZ81nEOD44w2AZyilw2BH3q5PUAOi4YEh1JpeKjqhYzR+GY02/+Q /+nf+bls7gUsREmriJ+nfIsGsvcdEj5pTMTnNcsZK4l2tJwRI8CzFYduM/TLFaqBBSkg MSdDEUv3YNWfzUXYm4vum27OmKPSrSAUcwoEoqiXCYYPq8p/ofsQZhZQxOqtniubIaK6 HQiYEboinEFXfjDweoBpYebHy4QukmOJKXxC5WGziJ1+2tbMT19PP/RTuuPjzDVAX1kx 9bdw== X-Received: by 10.140.85.42 with SMTP id m39mr52356778qgd.27.1439330362787; Tue, 11 Aug 2015 14:59:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hw10447.local (pool-68-134-10-53.bltmmd.fios.verizon.net. [68.134.10.53]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id l108sm2025337qge.2.2015.08.11.14.59.22 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 11 Aug 2015 14:59:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <55CA7038.7070607@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2015 17:59:20 -0400 From: Josh Elser User-Agent: Postbox 3.0.11 (Macintosh/20140602) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@calcite.incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Should Jackson-annotated POJOs stick around References: <55CA2DF1.9030808@gmail.com> <55CA37DF.5060302@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Looking at the link Andy sent out (https://github.com/FasterXML/jackson-dataformat-protobuf), I have two questions if you have the time: 1. "Experimental Jackson module" is that a concern for stability/maintenance? 2. "Version 2 of protoc supported; parser supports v3 as well but encoder/decoder does not." what does this mean WRT pbufv3? I couldn't find details about what the lack of an encode/decoder really means if I would try to do this. Thanks! Paul Brown wrote: > Just to let you guys know that you have some Jackson folks lurking around > on the list, so if there are things that we can do to help PB/JSON/other > work smoothly, let us know, as we're actively thinking about the best ways > to deal with multiple data protocols. > > — > prb@mult.ifario.us | Multifarious, Inc. | http://mult.ifario.us/ >