calcite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Josh Elser <josh.el...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Heads-up: Avatica now "disconnected" from root project
Date Tue, 08 Mar 2016 20:16:51 GMT
+1 works for me.

I'm undecided on avatica-core. Eventually, I think it should be split 
into an API and Client module, but, for now, I figured "core" is at 
least generic enough. I'm happy to entertain any other name suggestions.

Julian Hyde wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 8, 2016 at 7:00 AM, Josh Elser<josh.elser@gmail.com>  wrote:
>> I did intentionally change the groupId, but I'm not stuck on it. I figured
>> it would be nice to have a single groupId which contains all of Avatica.
>
> Let's talk about maven module names. It will be difficult to change
> them after the release.
>
> I like the idea of avatica modules having groupId "org.apache.calcite.avatica".
>
> Currently their names are prefixed "calcite-avatica-", e.g.
> "calcite-avatica", "calcite-avatica-server",
> "calcite-avatica-metrics-dropwizardmetrics3". "calcite-avatica-noop".
> I think we should remove the "calcite-" prefix, hence "avatica",
> "avatica-server", "avatica-metrics",
> "avatica-metrics-dropwizardmetrics3", "avatica-noop". Each module
> would still have "Apache Calcite" in its name, for example "Apache
> Calcite Avatica Server", and of course in its groupId. What do you
> think?
>
> Also, should we rename "avatica" to "avatica-core"? Less sure about that one.
>
> Julian

Mime
View raw message