calcite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Michael Mior <mm...@apache.org>
Subject Re: JMH dependency vs licensing
Date Fri, 10 Aug 2018 14:56:34 GMT
Perhaps we should just open up a JIRA case on legal for an official ruling.
It does seem like we should try to have ubenchmark excluded from releases.
Unless I'm mistaken, I don't belive it's required.

On Thu, Aug 9, 2018, 4:01 PM Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov.vladimir@gmail.com>
wrote:

> There are two questions there:
> 1) Is it possible to use third party code with "forbidden" licenses?
> As you say, the answer is "it is OK for optional modules".
>
> 2) What should be the license of `ubenchmark` module?
> It looks like `ubenchmark` code links to JMH in a way that we can't strip
> out JMH and replace it with another alternative.
>
> Apparently calcite-ubenchmark is published to Maven Central, so it does not
> look like "a temporary use for tests", but it finds its way to the Apache
> Calcite release.
>
> Vladimir
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message