calcite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Yuzhao Chen <yuzhao....@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Avatica 1.15.0
Date Thu, 09 May 2019 06:51:25 GMT
Fired a PR in https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/pull/97

Best,
Danny Chan
在 2019年5月9日 +0800 PM1:52,Francis Chuang <francischuang@apache.org>,写道:
> Thanks, Danny! If you can open a PR for it, I'll try to merge it in
> today and make 1.15.0-rc0 available for voting.
>
> Francis
>
> On 9/05/2019 3:49 pm, Yuzhao Chen wrote:
> > I test Drill 1.16.0 + Squirrel SQL 3.9 + avatica 1.15.0-SNAPSHOT and the error msg
comes back.
> >
> > Best,
> > Danny Chan
> > 在 2019年5月9日 +0800 PM12:12,Francis Chuang <francischuang@apache.org>,写道:
> > > Thanks for looking into this, Danny!
> > >
> > > I think that covers all bases. My only suggestion would be to see if you
> > > can use Squirrel SQL as the client and see if the error messages come
> > > back:
> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3040?focusedCommentId=16830674&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel#comment-16830674
> > >
> > > On 9/05/2019 1:21 pm, Yuzhao Chen wrote:
> > > > Broadly I think redundant error msg is much better than nothing, so revert
CALCITE-2845 is more accepttable.
> > > >
> > > > It seems the most breaking changes are from [1], but there are no more
tests so I just revert CALCITE-2845, and do these check:
> > > >
> > > > 1. Revert CALCITE-2845
> > > > 1. Test Calcite-Avatica master branch locally and passed
> > > > 2. Change Calcite master's avatica dependency version to 1.15.0-SNAPSHOT
and test locally, also passed
> > > >
> > > > Are there any other tests that I should do ? I’m wandering if I missed
something.
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://github.com/apache/calcite-avatica/blob/b7c6de180aa2f9cfa840504012d42c625595161d/core/src/main/java/org/apache/calcite/avatica/AvaticaConnection.java#L559
> > > >
> > > > Best,
> > > > Danny Chan
> > > > 在 2019年5月9日 +0800 AM9:34,Francis Chuang <francischuang@apache.org>,写道:
> > > > > Many thanks, Danny!
> > > > >
> > > > > On 9/05/2019 11:33 am, Yuzhao Chen wrote:
> > > > > > Francis, I will help to take this issue.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Best,
> > > > > > Danny Chan
> > > > > > 在 2019年5月9日 +0800 AM6:33,Francis Chuang <francischuang@apache.org>,写道:
> > > > > > > According to the issue, it blocks CALCITE-2817 [1], however
CALCITE-2817
> > > > > > > was in Calcite 1.19.0, which was released before Avatica
1.14.0.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > I am happy to revert CALCITE-2845 as I am pretty keen to
get the ball
> > > > > > > rolling for Avatica 1.15.0, but can someone please confirm
that it's
> > > > > > > safe to revert CALCITE-2845? We don't want to end up in
a situation
> > > > > > > where Avatica 1.15.0 is broken and ends up blocking Avatica-Go
and
> > > > > > > Calcite again.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2817
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 8/05/2019 11:56 pm, Stamatis Zampetakis wrote:
> > > > > > > > Since nobody is actively working on CALCITE-3040 and
we would like to
> > > > > > > > release 1.15.0 relatively soon, the only viable solution
is to revert
> > > > > > > > CALCITE-2845, hoping that people who downloaded 1.14.0
are not making
> > > > > > > > changes to their code based on that.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 12:29 AM Francis Chuang <francischuang@apache.org>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Could someone please have a look at CALCITE-3040
[1]?
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > CALCITE-3040 is a blocker for 1.15.0 and I can
make rc0 available for
> > > > > > > > > voting once it's fixed.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Francis
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3040
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On 1/05/2019 10:47 am, Francis Chuang wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > After Avatica 1.14.0 was released, it was
reported that the fix for
> > > > > > > > > > CALCITE-2845 [1] broke some existing clients.
This is currently being
> > > > > > > > > > tracked in CALCITE-3040 [2].
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > We need to release Avatica 1.15.0 to fix
this issue, so that Calcite can
> > > > > > > > > > upgrade its version of Avatica.
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > While this is a tiny release, it's also
possible to include other fixes,
> > > > > > > > > > if required. Other than CALCITE-3040, are
there any other issues you
> > > > > > > > > > guys would like to see fixed?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Francis
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2845
> > > > > > > > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3040
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> >

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message