calcite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Francis Chuang <francischu...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Avatica 1.15.0
Date Thu, 09 May 2019 01:34:19 GMT
Many thanks, Danny!

On 9/05/2019 11:33 am, Yuzhao Chen wrote:
> Francis, I will help to take this issue.
> 
> Best,
> Danny Chan
> 在 2019年5月9日 +0800 AM6:33,Francis Chuang <francischuang@apache.org>,写道:
>> According to the issue, it blocks CALCITE-2817 [1], however CALCITE-2817
>> was in Calcite 1.19.0, which was released before Avatica 1.14.0.
>>
>> I am happy to revert CALCITE-2845 as I am pretty keen to get the ball
>> rolling for Avatica 1.15.0, but can someone please confirm that it's
>> safe to revert CALCITE-2845? We don't want to end up in a situation
>> where Avatica 1.15.0 is broken and ends up blocking Avatica-Go and
>> Calcite again.
>>
>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2817
>>
>> On 8/05/2019 11:56 pm, Stamatis Zampetakis wrote:
>>> Since nobody is actively working on CALCITE-3040 and we would like to
>>> release 1.15.0 relatively soon, the only viable solution is to revert
>>> CALCITE-2845, hoping that people who downloaded 1.14.0 are not making
>>> changes to their code based on that.
>>>
>>> On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 12:29 AM Francis Chuang <francischuang@apache.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Could someone please have a look at CALCITE-3040 [1]?
>>>>
>>>> CALCITE-3040 is a blocker for 1.15.0 and I can make rc0 available for
>>>> voting once it's fixed.
>>>>
>>>> Francis
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3040
>>>>
>>>> On 1/05/2019 10:47 am, Francis Chuang wrote:
>>>>> After Avatica 1.14.0 was released, it was reported that the fix for
>>>>> CALCITE-2845 [1] broke some existing clients. This is currently being
>>>>> tracked in CALCITE-3040 [2].
>>>>>
>>>>> We need to release Avatica 1.15.0 to fix this issue, so that Calcite
can
>>>>> upgrade its version of Avatica.
>>>>>
>>>>> While this is a tiny release, it's also possible to include other fixes,
>>>>> if required. Other than CALCITE-3040, are there any other issues you
>>>>> guys would like to see fixed?
>>>>>
>>>>> Francis
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-2845
>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3040
>>>>
>>>
> 

Mime
View raw message