calcite-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Haisheng Yuan <hy...@apache.org>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Towards Calcite 1.23.0
Date Mon, 11 May 2020 13:51:53 GMT
Oops, thanks for reminding. lol

On 2020/05/11 09:41:33, Stamatis Zampetakis <zabetak@gmail.com> wrote: 
> Previously you mentioned:
> ~/vlsi-release-plugins ❯❯❯ ./gradlew prepareVote -Prc=0
> 
> Just to be sure for releasing Calcite you should execute ./gradlew
> prepareVote -Prc=0 in calcite directory (not in vlsi-release-plugins).
> 
> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 11:03 AM Haisheng Yuan <hyuan@apache.org> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Stamatis,
> >
> > I tried to add all the info to the property file, still no luck:
> >
> > signing.gnupg.keyName=3CD22ABAC50DDCEF
> > asfCommitterId=hyuan
> > ghTestGitSourceUsername=test
> > ghTestGitSourcePassword=test
> > ghTestNexusUsername=test
> > ghTestNexusPassword=test
> > asfGitSourceUsername=test
> > asfGitSourcePassword=test
> > asfNexusUsername=test
> > asfNexusPassword=test
> > asfGitSourceUsername=test
> > asfGitSourcePassword=test
> > asfSvnUsername=test
> > asfSvnPassword=test
> >
> > useGpgCmd=true
> > signing.gnupg.useLegacyGpg=true
> >
> > 1: Task failed with an exception.
> > -----------
> > * What went wrong:
> > Execution failed for task ':initializeNexusStagingRepository'.
> > > Failed to find staging profile for package group: com.github.vlsi
> >
> > * Try:
> > Run with --stacktrace option to get the stack trace. Run with --info or
> > --debug option to get more log output. Run with --scan to get full insights.
> >
> > ==============================================================================
> >
> > 2: Task failed with an exception.
> > -----------
> > * What went wrong:
> > Execution failed for task
> > ':plugins:crlf-plugin:signCrlfPluginMarkerMavenPublication'.
> > > Process 'command 'gpg'' finished with non-zero exit value 2
> >
> > * Try:
> > Run with --stacktrace option to get the stack trace. Run with --info or
> > --debug option to get more log output. Run with --scan to get full insights.
> >
> > ==============================================================================
> >
> > 3: Task failed with an exception.
> > -----------
> > * What went wrong:
> > Execution failed for task
> > ':plugins:checksum-dependency-plugin:signChecksum-dependencyPluginMarkerMavenPublication'.
> > > Process 'command 'gpg'' finished with non-zero exit value 2
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Haisheng
> >
> > On 2020/05/11 08:41:16, Stamatis Zampetakis <zabetak@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Hi Haisheng,
> > >
> > > You might be missing some gradle.properties especially those required to
> > > identify your PGP key.
> > >
> > > Have a look in the discussion in [1]. Among other info it contains also
> > the
> > > complete list of properties.
> > >
> > > Best,
> > > Stamatis
> > >
> > > [1]
> > >
> > https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r71feef9a44c1f4ea0f2211dc8c74b25dab143d2e3215cf7ffcfd6f56%40%3Cdev.calcite.apache.org%3E
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 9:55 AM Haisheng Yuan <hyuan@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I saw this error during the dry-run:
> > > > ~/vlsi-release-plugins ❯❯❯ ./gradlew prepareVote -Prc=0
> > > > > Task :plugins:crlf-plugin:signCrlfPluginMarkerMavenPublication FAILED
> > > > > Task
> > > >
> > :plugins:checksum-dependency-plugin:signChecksum-dependencyPluginMarkerMavenPublication
> > > > FAILED
> > > > > Task :initializeNexusStagingRepository FAILED
> > > >
> > > > FAILURE: Build completed with 3 failures.
> > > >
> > > > 1: Task failed with an exception.
> > > > -----------
> > > > * What went wrong:
> > > > Execution failed for task
> > > > ':plugins:crlf-plugin:signCrlfPluginMarkerMavenPublication'.
> > > > > Cannot perform signing task
> > > > ':plugins:crlf-plugin:signCrlfPluginMarkerMavenPublication' because it
> > has
> > > > no configured signatory
> > > >
> > > > * Try:
> > > > Run with --stacktrace option to get the stack trace. Run with --info or
> > > > --debug option to get more log output. Run with --scan to get full
> > insights.
> > > >
> > > >
> > ==============================================================================
> > > >
> > > > 2: Task failed with an exception.
> > > > -----------
> > > > * What went wrong:
> > > > Execution failed for task
> > > >
> > ':plugins:checksum-dependency-plugin:signChecksum-dependencyPluginMarkerMavenPublication'.
> > > > > Cannot perform signing task
> > > >
> > ':plugins:checksum-dependency-plugin:signChecksum-dependencyPluginMarkerMavenPublication'
> > > > because it has no configured signatory
> > > >
> > > > * Try:
> > > > Run with --stacktrace option to get the stack trace. Run with --info or
> > > > --debug option to get more log output. Run with --scan to get full
> > insights.
> > > >
> > > >
> > ==============================================================================
> > > >
> > > > 3: Task failed with an exception.
> > > > -----------
> > > > * What went wrong:
> > > > Execution failed for task ':initializeNexusStagingRepository'.
> > > > > Failed to find staging profile for package group: com.github.vlsi
> > > >
> > > > Here is the gradle.properties settings:
> > > > ghTestGitSourceUsername=test
> > > > ghTestGitSourcePassword=test
> > > > ghTestNexusUsername=test
> > > > ghTestNexusPassword=test
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > BTW, my gpg public key has been uploaded:
> > > >
> > https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?search=0x3CD22ABAC50DDCEF&op=vindex&exact=on
> > > >
> > > > And the gpg fingerprint has been updated in my apache id profile at
> > > > https://id.apache.org/.
> > > >
> > > > Any kind of help is appreciated.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Haisheng
> > > >
> > > > On 2020/05/06 02:09:11, Chunwei Lei <chunwei.leii@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Hi, Haisheng, I would like to review the PR for CALCITE-3896.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Best,
> > > > > Chunwei
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, May 6, 2020 at 4:50 AM Rui Wang <amaliujia@apache.org>
> > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks for leading 1.23.0 release, Haisheng!
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I will actively contact Danny and Feng to see if we can reach
a
> > > > conclusion
> > > > > > on https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/1761 by next monday.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Rui
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 11:31 AM Haisheng Yuan <hyuan@apache.org>
> > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > Yes, no problem. Will have a RC before next Monday, PDT.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > @Roman, thanks for helping.
> > > > > > > This is the PR: https://github.com/apache/calcite/pull/1953
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Haisheng
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On 2020/05/05 14:57:48, Julian Hyde <jhyde.apache@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > Thanks for volunteering, Haisheng.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Before everyone piles in with wish-lists, can we set
a
> > timescale
> > > > for
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > release?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > I would suggest an aggressive timescale, for example
an RC a
> > week
> > > > from
> > > > > > > today. Hold the RC only for mandatory cases. Other stuff
gets in
> > if
> > > > it’s
> > > > > > > ready.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Julian
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On May 5, 2020, at 5:51 AM, Ruben Q L <rubenql@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Thanks for starting the discussion, Stamatis.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Just a reminder that there is a blocking issue
[1] that
> > needs to
> > > > be
> > > > > > > solved
> > > > > > > > > (it is a regression introduced after 1.22).
> > > > > > > > > Apart from that, it would be nice if we could
include [2] in
> > > > 1.23.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > > > > > Ruben
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3926
> > > > > > > > > [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CALCITE-3951
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >> Le mar. 5 mai 2020 à 12:34, Roman Kondakov
> > > > > > <kondakov87@mail.ru.invalid>
> > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > >> écrit :
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> Hi Haisheng,
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> I would like to review CALCITE-3896. Do you
have a PR?
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >> --
> > > > > > > > >> Kind Regards
> > > > > > > > >> Roman Kondakov
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > > >>> On 05.05.2020 06:37, Haisheng Yuan wrote:
> > > > > > > > >>> IIRC, I am the release manager for 1.23.0.
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>> I think CALCITE-3896 (top-down trait
request) is in good
> > > > shape, it
> > > > > > > will
> > > > > > > > >> be nice if it can go into 1.23.0. Can someone
help review?
> > > > > > > > >>>
> > > > > > > > >>> On 2020/05/04 22:58:25, Stamatis Zampetakis
<
> > zabetak@gmail.com
> > > > >
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >>>> Hello,
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>> Calcite 1.22.0 was released about
2 months ago (on March
> > 5,
> > > > 2020).
> > > > > > > > >> During
> > > > > > > > >>>> the vote we said to try to have a
release sooner than
> > usual
> > > > so I
> > > > > > am
> > > > > > > > >>>> launching the discussion now hoping
we could get to 1.23.0
> > > > rather
> > > > > > > soon.
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>> I was checking the status of the
current release [1] and
> > we
> > > > have
> > > > > > > already
> > > > > > > > >>>> over 100 resolved issues with 91
fixes so it is already
> > pretty
> > > > > > big.
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>> I know that there quite a few discussions
in progress so
> > it
> > > > would
> > > > > > be
> > > > > > > > >> good
> > > > > > > > >>>> to see how many of the ongoing cases
should be fixed for
> > > > 1.23.0.
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>> More importantly do we have a release
manager for 1.23.0?
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>> Best,
> > > > > > > > >>>> Stamatis
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>>> [1]
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa?selectPageId=12333950
> > > > > > > > >>>>
> > > > > > > > >>
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> 

Mime
View raw message