[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10365?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14953624#comment-14953624
]
Adam Holmberg commented on CASSANDRA-10365:
-------------------------------------------
To be clear, I was thinking this would still be side-by-side with the pure cql representation,
so hopefully the goal of server-side simplification could still be attained. (?)
> Consider storing types by their CQL names in schema tables instead of fully-qualified
internal class names
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-10365
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-10365
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Aleksey Yeschenko
> Assignee: Aleksey Yeschenko
> Labels: client-impacting
> Fix For: 3.0.0 rc2
>
>
> Consider saving CQL types names for column, UDF/UDA arguments and return types, and UDT
components.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
|