cloudstack-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From motty cruz <motty.c...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: CS 4.2 Advance Zone System VM won't start
Date Thu, 17 Oct 2013 12:54:55 GMT
Thank you Sanjeev, that was solved my problem!



On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Sanjeev Neelarapu <
sanjeev.neelarapu@citrix.com> wrote:

> Did you allow ping traffic in ingress rules in the guest network?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: motty cruz [mailto:motty.cruz@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2013 2:44 AM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: CS 4.2 Advance Zone System VM won't start
>
> So after changing my gateway to public address my System VMs started, I
> was able to download a ISO install an instance but I'm unable to ping the
> instance, or the VR, guest CIDR 10.1.1.0/24 guest traffic is in the same
> network as public traffic using vlan 100.
> this is how eth0 public interface looks like
>
> DEVICE=eth0
> HWADDR=00:15:17:7B:67:65
> ONBOOT=yes
> BRIDGE=cloudbr0
>
> DEVICE=eth0.99
> HWADDR=00:15:17:7B:67:65
> ONBOOT=yes
> VLAN=yes
>
>
> DEVICE=eth0.100
> HWADDR=00:15:17:7B:67:65
> ONBOOT=yes
> VLAN=yes
>
> I'm not sure if this is correct?
> Thanks,
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 1:03 PM, motty cruz <motty.cruz@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Thank you very much,
> > my gateway was set to local network,
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >
> > On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Amogh Vasekar <
> amogh.vasekar@citrix.com>wrote:
> >
> >> Possibly - Your default gateway on the host is set to your internal
> >> 192.* gateway? What does route -n say?
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Amogh
> >>
> >> On 10/11/13 9:18 AM, "motty cruz" <motty.cruz@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Thank you for your reply, I blow out my installation, started from
> >> >scratch; you mentioned that we don't configure bridge for guest VLAN
> >> >traffic but Cloudstack did not configure it automatically. Also, I
> >> >noticied after installed cloudstack-agent and configure advance zone
> >> >four new interfaces appear vnet0 - vnet3. I don't know what that is.
> >> >root@kvm4 network-scripts]# brctl show
> >> >bridge name     bridge id               STP enabled     interfaces
> >> >cloud0          8000.fe00a9fe025f       no              vnet0
> >> >cloudbr0                8000.0015177b6765       no              eth0
> >> >                                                        vnet2
> >> >cloudbr1                8000.0015177b6764       no              eth1
> >> >                                                        vnet1
> >> >                                                        vnet3
> >> >virbr0          8000.525400643b18       yes             virbr0-nic
> >> >
> >> >after re-installing Cloudstack-management on the management server
> >> >and Cloudstack-agent on the KVM host configure two bridge cloudbr0
> >> >for public/guest and Cloudbr1 for managemen/storage, now my system
> >> >VMs are running but when trying to download and iso, I get the
> >> >follwoing error
> >> "No
> >> >route to host",
> >> >here is my cloudbr0 bridge for public/guest traffic
> >> >[root@kvm4 network-scripts]# less ifcfg-cloudbr0
> >> >DEVICE=cloudbr0
> >> >ONBOOT=yes
> >> >TYPE=Bridge
> >> >IPADDR=xxx.xxxx.xxx
> >> >GATEWAY=xxxx.xxxx.xxxx.xxx
> >> >NETMASK=255.255.255.0
> >> >DNS1=8.8.8.8
> >> >
> >> >base on eth0
> >> >DEVICE=eth0
> >> >HWADDR=00:15:17:7B:67:65
> >> >ONBOOT=yes
> >> >BRIDGE=cloudbr0
> >> >
> >> >Thanks again,
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >On Fri, Oct 11, 2013 at 2:20 AM, Sanjeev Neelarapu <
> >> >sanjeev.neelarapu@citrix.com> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Hi,
> >> >>
> >> >> Please post management server log and agent log from kvm (with
> >> >> debug
> >> >> enabled) to find out the issue .
> >> >> We don't have to created bridge with guest vlan for guest traffic.
> >> >> Cloudstack will configure it automatically on kvm when required.
> >> >>
> >> >> -Sanjeev
> >> >>
> >> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> >> From: motty cruz [mailto:motty.cruz@gmail.com]
> >> >> Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2013 10:50 PM
> >> >> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> >> >> Subject: CS 4.2 Advance Zone System VM won't start
> >> >>
> >> >> Hi,
> >> >> I posted this problem in the past and got no help, so I'm trying
> >> >> my
> >> luck
> >> >> again I install CS 4.2, configure advance zone for KVM cluster
> >> >>here is my  brctl
> >> >> [root@kvm4 network-scripts]# brctl show
> >> >> bridge name     bridge id               STP enabled     interfaces
> >> >> cloud0          8000.fe00a9fe0212       no              vnet0
> >> >> cloudbr0                8000.0015177b6765       no              eth0
> >> >>                                                         vnet1
> >> >>                                                         vnet3
> >> >> cloudbr1                8000.0015177b6764       no              eth1
> >> >>                                                         vnet2
> >> >> cloudbr99               8000.0015177b6764       no
>  eth1.99
> >> >> virbr0          8000.52540089a4da       yes             virbr0-nic
> >> >>
> >> >> I'm using inteface eth0 for management
> >> >> [root@kvm4 network-scripts]# less ifcfg-eth0
> >> >> DEVICE=eth0
> >> >> ONBOOT=yes
> >> >> BRIDGE=cloudbr0
> >> >>
> >> >> here is bridge for eth0
> >> >> DEVICE=cloudbr0
> >> >> ONBOOT=yes
> >> >> TYPE=Bridge
> >> >> IPADDR=192.168.0.10
> >> >> NETMASK=255.255.255.0
> >> >> GATEWAY=192.168.0.1
> >> >> DNS1=8.8.8.8
> >> >>
> >> >> I'm using eth1 for public/guest
> >> >> [root@kvm4 network-scripts]# less ifcfg-eth1
> >> >> DEVICE=eth1
> >> >> ONBOOT=yes
> >> >> BRIDGE=cloudbr1
> >> >>
> >> >> here is bridge to public network untag in vlan 1 by default
> >> >> DEVICE=cloudbr1
> >> >> ONBOOT=yes
> >> >> TYPE=Bridge
> >> >> IPADDR=98.234.34.208
> >> >> NETMASK=255.255.255.0
> >> >>
> >> >> I created VLAN 99 for guest traffic
> >> >> DEVICE=eth1.99
> >> >> ONBOOT=yes
> >> >> VLAN=yes
> >> >> BRIDGE=cloudbr99
> >> >>
> >> >> DEVICE=cloudbr99
> >> >> ONBOOT=yes
> >> >> TYPE=Bridge
> >> >> IPADDR=10.1.1.2
> >> >> NETMASK=255.255.255.0
> >> >> DNS1=8.8.8.8
> >> >>
> >> >> I'm using CLVM for primary storage, I noticed system vms were
> >> >> created
> >> >> lvm> lvscan
> >> >>   inactive
> >> >>'/dev/hitachi-1/c490e01b-4e40-40fb-aa56-fbedd89b86cd'
> >> >> [1.95 GiB] inherit
> >> >>   inactive
> >> >>'/dev/hitachi-1/ec032d27-26a4-467b-a1da-222402eedd60'
> >> >> [1.95 GiB] inherit
> >> >>   ACTIVE            '/dev/vg_kvm2/lv_root' [189.20 GiB] inherit
> >> >>   ACTIVE            '/dev/vg_kvm2/lv_swap' [31.51 GiB] inherit
> >> >> lvm>
> >> >>
> >> >> here is my age.properties file:
> >> >> #Storage
> >> >> #Thu Oct 10 09:47:57 PDT 2013
> >> >> guest.network.device=cloudbr99
> >> >> workers=5
> >> >> private.network.device=cloudbr0
> >> >> port=8250
> >> >> resource=com.cloud.hypervisor.kvm.resource.LibvirtComputingResourc
> >> >> e
> >> >> pod=1
> >> >> zone=1
> >> >> guid=10d96879-df46-3b97-9428-85e2934e0b95
> >> >> public.network.device=cloudbr1
> >> >> cluster=1
> >> >> local.storage.uuid=7c563a7d-e257-48da-9133-cf5ae8973761
> >> >> domr.scripts.dir=scripts/network/domr/kvm
> >> >> LibvirtComputingResource.id=1
> >> >> host=192.168.0.5
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> but System VMs are not starting, can someone tell me if VLAN are
> >> >>configure  right?
> >> >>
> >> >> log:
> >> >> 2013-10-10 10:17:58,838 DEBUG
> >> >> [network.lb.LBHealthCheckManagerImpl]
> >> >> (LBHealthCheck-1:null) LB HealthCheck Manager is running and
> >> >> getting
> >> the
> >> >> updates from LB providers and updating service status
> >> >>
> >> >> 2013-10-10 10:18:19,049 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> >> >> (CapacityChecker:null) Found 2 VMs on host 1
> >> >> 2013-10-10 10:18:19,060 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> >> >> (CapacityChecker:null) Found 0 VM, not running on host 1
> >> >> 2013-10-10 10:18:19,049 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> >> >> (CapacityChecker:null) Found 2 VMs on host 1
> >> >> 2013-10-10 10:18:19,060 DEBUG [cloud.capacity.CapacityManagerImpl]
> >> >> (CapacityChecker:null) Found 0 VM, not running on host 1
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks in advance!
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message