> On Oct 2, 2014, at 12:57 AM, Daan Hoogland <daan.hoogland@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 2, 2014 at 12:29 AM, Carlos Reátegui <creategui@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Daan,
>> Any chance you got to look at this? I am still confused why for a basic
>> network with no vlans the code is expecting a uri for a vlan.
>> thanks
>
> It is a known issue, can you do your setup with specifying a vlan? I
> suspect this being the issue. It won't use the vlan but it needs a value.
Where do I do that?
> Needs fixing but I think it will work with this work around. I am not sure
> what the most solid fix would be and that would be more a discussion for
> dev@...
>
> You could think of inserting a default value when doing basic networking or
> a check on networking type when creating the router/instances. Both seem
> quirky, though.
>
> regards,
> --
> Daan
|