cloudstack-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ivan Kudryavtsev <kudryavtsev...@bw-sw.com>
Subject Re: Poor NVMe Performance with KVM
Date Fri, 17 May 2019 12:22:57 GMT
Nux,

I use Ubuntu 16.04 with "none" scheduler and the latest kernel 4.15. Guest
is Ubuntu 18.04 with Noop scheduler for scsi-virtio  and "none" for virtio.

Thanks.

пт, 17 мая 2019 г., 19:18 Nux! <nux@li.nux.ro>:

> Hi,
>
> What HV is that? CentOS? Are you using the right tuned profile? What about
> in the guest? Which IO scheduler?
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Ivan Kudryavtsev" <kudryavtsev_ia@bw-sw.com>
> > To: "users" <users@cloudstack.apache.org>
> > Sent: Friday, 17 May, 2019 10:13:50
> > Subject: Poor NVMe Performance with KVM
>
> > Hello, colleagues.
> >
> > Hope, someone could help me. I just deployed a new VM host with Intel
> P4500
> > local storage NVMe drive.
> >
> > From Hypervisor host I can get expected performance, 200K RIOPS, 3GBs
> with
> > FIO, write performance is also high as expected.
> >
> > I've created a new KVM VM Service offering with virtio-scsi controller
> > (tried virtio as well) and VM is deployed. Now I try to benchmark it with
> > FIO. Results are very strange:
> >
> > 1. Read/Write with large blocks (1M) shows expected performance (my
> limits
> > are R=1000/W=500 MBs).
> >
> > 2. Write with direct=0 leads to expected 50K IOPS, while write with
> > direct=1 leads to very moderate 2-3K IOPS.
> >
> > 3. Read with direct=0, direct=1 both lead to 3000 IOPS.
> >
> > During the benchmark I see VM IOWAIT=20%, while host IOWAIT is 0% which
> is
> > strange.
> >
> > So, basically, from inside VM my NVMe works very slow when small IOPS are
> > executed. From the host, it works great.
> >
> > I tried to mount the volume with NBD to /dev/nbd0 and benchmark. Read
> > performance is nice. Maybe someone managed to use NVME with KVM with
> small
> > IOPS?
> >
> > The filesystem is XFS, previously tried with EXT4 - results are the same.
> >
> > This is the part of VM XML definition generated by CloudStack:
> >
> >  <devices>
> >    <emulator>/usr/bin/kvm-spice</emulator>
> >    <disk type='file' device='disk'>
> >      <driver name='qemu' type='qcow2' cache='none' discard='unmap'/>
> >      <source
> > file='/var/lib/libvirt/images/6809dbd0-4a15-4014-9322-fe9010695934'/>
> >      <backingStore type='file' index='1'>
> >        <format type='raw'/>
> >        <source
> > file='/var/lib/libvirt/images/ac43742c-3991-4be1-bff1-7617bf4fc6ef'/>
> >        <backingStore/>
> >      </backingStore>
> >      <target dev='sda' bus='scsi'/>
> >      <iotune>
> >        <read_bytes_sec>1048576000</read_bytes_sec>
> >        <write_bytes_sec>524288000</write_bytes_sec>
> >        <read_iops_sec>100000</read_iops_sec>
> >        <write_iops_sec>50000</write_iops_sec>
> >      </iotune>
> >      <serial>6809dbd04a1540149322</serial>
> >      <alias name='scsi0-0-0-0'/>
> >      <address type='drive' controller='0' bus='0' target='0' unit='0'/>
> >    </disk>
> >    <disk type='file' device='cdrom'>
> >      <driver name='qemu' type='raw'/>
> >      <backingStore/>
> >      <target dev='hdc' bus='ide'/>
> >      <readonly/>
> >      <alias name='ide0-1-0'/>
> >      <address type='drive' controller='0' bus='1' target='0' unit='0'/>
> >    </disk>
> >    <controller type='scsi' index='0' model='virtio-scsi'>
> >      <alias name='scsi0'/>
> >      <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x09'
> > function='0x0'/>
> >    </controller>
> >
> > So, what I see now, is that it works slower than couple of two Samsung
> 960
> > PRO which is extremely strange.
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> >
> >
> > --
> > With best regards, Ivan Kudryavtsev
> > Bitworks LLC
> > Cell RU: +7-923-414-1515
> > Cell USA: +1-201-257-1512
> > WWW: http://bitworks.software/ <http://bw-sw.com/>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message