cloudstack-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Andrija Panic <andrija.pa...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Is VRRP possible inside KVM/ACS
Date Thu, 21 Nov 2019 22:26:41 GMT
VRRP is possible to configure anywhere - it's a different question whether
it will work due to firewall rules...
The simplest way to give yourself an answer is to test (allow all ingress,
all egress and test).

On Thu, 21 Nov 2019 at 22:20, Fariborz Navidan <mdvlinquest@gmail.com>
wrote:

> If security groups use ebtables, so why does my ebtables does not have any
> rule on the host? Default egress policy on my guest network is Allow and I
> have added tcp/udp/icmp ingress rules to allow traffic go through.
>
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 12:03 AM Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>
> wrote:
>
> > VRRP is a network layer protocol, uses multicast address 224.0.0.18 and
> > protocol number 112. As long as SG can allow this, it's possible, however
> > that may not be available out of the box. You can try some custom
> ebtables
> > rules on the KVM hosts.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Rohit Yadav
> >
> > Software Architect, ShapeBlue
> >
> > https://www.shapeblue.com
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Fariborz Navidan <mdvlinquest@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2019 17:56
> > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org <users@cloudstack.apache.org>
> > Subject: Is VRRP possible inside KVM/ACS
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > Is it possible to configure VRRP  inside KVM in a security group enabled
> > advanced zone? Should I enable Promisscouous mode and forged transmit?
> >
> > rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
> > www.shapeblue.com
> > Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
> > @shapeblue
> >
> >
> >
> >
>


-- 

Andrija Panić

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message