cloudstack-users mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Fariborz Navidan <mdvlinqu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Is VRRP possible inside KVM/ACS
Date Thu, 21 Nov 2019 21:20:09 GMT
If security groups use ebtables, so why does my ebtables does not have any
rule on the host? Default egress policy on my guest network is Allow and I
have added tcp/udp/icmp ingress rules to allow traffic go through.

On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 12:03 AM Rohit Yadav <rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com>
wrote:

> VRRP is a network layer protocol, uses multicast address 224.0.0.18 and
> protocol number 112. As long as SG can allow this, it's possible, however
> that may not be available out of the box. You can try some custom ebtables
> rules on the KVM hosts.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Rohit Yadav
>
> Software Architect, ShapeBlue
>
> https://www.shapeblue.com
>
> ________________________________
> From: Fariborz Navidan <mdvlinquest@gmail.com>
> Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2019 17:56
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org <users@cloudstack.apache.org>
> Subject: Is VRRP possible inside KVM/ACS
>
> Hello,
>
> Is it possible to configure VRRP  inside KVM in a security group enabled
> advanced zone? Should I enable Promisscouous mode and forged transmit?
>
> rohit.yadav@shapeblue.com
> www.shapeblue.com
> Amadeus House, Floral Street, London  WC2E 9DPUK
> @shapeblue
>
>
>
>

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message