André Thénot wrote:
> On Apr 4, 2005, at 9:06, Andre Juffer wrote:
>
>> You can also access the database directly in your script. You could
>> return some object from persistence, which you could use to populate
>> your bean. Maybe it is possible to use that object as the bean for the
>> form (not tried).
>
>
> IIRC, direct database access from javascript flowscripts is no longer
> supported. But you can create a java object that talks to the database
> and grabs values to place in the form if it's a new one. In other words,
> handle both the form submissions and the form prepopulating from your
> flowscript.
You are correct. This is way how it should be done. My formulation was
not accurate.
Just wondering, it is therefore possible to let some java-based
com.foo.Values object act as the bean for a form? Or is always required
to let a javascript-based object in the flowscript act as the bean for a
form, as the examples seem to imply. I have used the second approach.
>
> A.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@cocoon.apache.org
>
--
Andre H. Juffer | Phone: +358-8-553 1161
The Biocenter and | Fax: +358-8-553-1141
the Dep. of Biochemistry | Email: Andre.Juffer@oulu.fi
University of Oulu, Finland | WWW: www.biochem.oulu.fi/Biocomputing/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@cocoon.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@cocoon.apache.org
|