commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Scott Sanders" <ssand...@nextance.com>
Subject RE: how should log levels work? [Was Re: [Logging] default log level]
Date Thu, 10 Jan 2002 18:55:11 GMT
As long as isInfoEnabled and isDebugEnabled is supportable, I think that
getLevel and setLevel can be removed from the interface and only exist
on the SimpleLog.

I think that configuration is outside of this wrapper, and this
demarcates that very clearly.

Scott

> -----Original Message-----
> From: robert burrell donkin [mailto:robertdonkin@mac.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 10:58 AM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: how should log levels work? [Was Re: [Logging] 
> default log level]
> 
> 
> 
> On Thursday, January 10, 2002, at 06:45 PM, Scott Sanders wrote:
> 
> > Does this also remove the isInfoEnabled and isDebugEnabled?
> 
> LogKit has these so we do have delegated implementations of 
> these methods 
> for all currently supported log system.
> 
> the more i think about it, the more it seems to me that if we 
> want a log 
> level property  then it should be implemented internally in 
> commons-logging.
> 
> - robert
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> <mailto:commons-dev-> unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> For 
> additional commands, 
> e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message