commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Geir Magnusson Jr." <>
Subject Re: [Vote] ARMI as Commons package +1
Date Thu, 10 Jan 2002 02:02:17 GMT
On 1/9/02 11:36 AM, "Ted Husted" <> wrote:

> Paul, 
> I believe that its possible that not enough of us understand the
> background of the ARMI codebase.
> There's a lot going on, and it can be helpful to spoonfeed us old,
> feeble, and bandwith-challenged folk =:0)
> Given the other tidbits that have come up in this thread, I would now
> toss my binding 
> +1

Ted - I have come to understand you as a stickler for rules and order (among
other positive qualities :)

A related thread is discussing the fact that the proposal doesn't even
satisfy the rules that you took the time to record for us and post...

> It's important to understand that the sandbox is open to any Jakarta
> committer, and it's helpful to make an actual proposal, as detailed in
> the Commons charter, so that we know what's what.

It's not 'helpful'.  Isn't 'required' the word you are looking for?
> If the component is also going to be useful to the Avalon codebase, then
> I would say it has a high potential of being supported in the longterm,
> and would be a welcome addition.

Yes - that I agree with.

Geir Magnusson Jr.             
System and Software Consulting
You're going to end up getting pissed at your software
anyway, so you might as well not pay for it. Try Open Source.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <>
For additional commands, e-mail: <>

View raw message