commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Geir Magnusson Jr." <ge...@optonline.net>
Subject Re: [PROPOSAL] Update to Commons package approval guideline
Date Thu, 10 Jan 2002 02:14:43 GMT
On 1/9/02 6:36 PM, "Ted Husted" <husted@apache.org> wrote:

> robert burrell donkin wrote:
>> +0
>> 
>> i'd prefer requiring 3/4 of the votes cast to override a veto but i'm not
>> willing to veto the proposal since i think that it'll be an improvement on
>> the current situation.
>> 
>> i'd like to think that we'll be able to reach consensus most times. i'd
>> also prefer some sort of extended time limit to receive votes on a project
>> submission so that we can at least try to resolve issues (which is what a
>> committer veto represents) before the project goes into the commons.
>> 
>> - robert
> 
> 
> My feeling is that we should try and create as few new wheels as
> possible.
> 
> The language in Martin's proposal is straight from the Jakarta
> guidelines for approving a release.
> 
> So, I'd say if this type of vote is good enough for release code from a
> subproject, it should be good enough to accept code into the Commons.
> 

+1

-- 
Geir Magnusson Jr.                                     geirm@optonline.net
System and Software Consulting
"He who throws mud only loses ground." - Fat Albert


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message