commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Waldhoff, Rodney" <>
Subject RE: GenericKeyedObjectPool
Date Wed, 01 May 2002 14:48:01 GMT
The GenericKeyedObjectPool case is trickier. I just committed a change along
these lines, but it would be great if someone could peer-review to make sure
I didn't screw something up there.  We could make a similar change to
StackKeyedObjectPool as well, and for that matter to some of the other
methods (borrowObject, etc.), but someone may ambitious than me may have to
do it. Frankly I don't see much performance difference either way, but
perhaps my Factory calls are just smaller than yours.

- Rod

-----Original Message-----
From: Randy Speh []
Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 8:38 AM

I was wondering if the following bug fix that was made
in GenericObjectPool will be made th the

applied changes described in bug 7519

Randy Speh

  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message