commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jack, Paul" <>
Subject RE: [PATCH][Collections] SequencedHashMap: equals, hashCode, toSt ring
Date Fri, 24 May 2002 19:49:29 GMT
> Extending AbstractMap is not the right way to add an equals, 
> hashcode and 
> toString method.  I just committed real implementations for 
> the methods.

Was there something wrong with AbstractMap's implementations,
or did you just want to keep SequencedHashMap's superclass
as Object?  I'm just wondering if there's something my 
unit tests aren't catching...


To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <>
For additional commands, e-mail: <>

View raw message