commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Scott Sanders" <ssand...@nextance.com>
Subject RE: [lang] JDK 1.0/1.1
Date Thu, 11 Jul 2002 16:21:26 GMT
No, we make the user install collections.jar.  They have gone through
the trouble to find commons-lang, finding collections.jar from sun is
not that much harder :)

Scott

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Henri Yandell [mailto:bayard@generationjava.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2002 6:11 AM
> To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> Subject: RE: [lang] JDK 1.0/1.1
> 
> 
> Yep. I see no reason for the current code base to not support 
> 1.1 as it practically does, but when new features for 1.3/1.4 
> come along, a conditional compilation would make a lot of sense.
> 
> The only real painful bit is, do we try to use Hashtable and 
> Vector where possible to keep classes at 1.1?
> 
> Hen
> 
> On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Scott Sanders wrote:
> 
> > I was only stating that I am happy to have 1.1 support if 
> we don't use 
> > that as a banner to NOT have 1.3/1.4 features.  Kind of like the 
> > conditional compilation that DBCP does.  Does that make sense?
> >
> > Scott
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Henri Yandell [mailto:bayard@generationjava.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 12:16 PM
> > > To: Jakarta Commons Developers List
> > > Subject: RE: [lang] JDK 1.0/1.1
> > >
> > >
> > > I think I'm starting to misuse the -1/+1 terminogy a bit 
> :) I find 
> > > myself being +1 or -1 things at work as well. Jakarta has 
> warped me.
> > >
> > > Complaint was the wrong word. I should have said:
> > >
> > > I'm -1 Scott's -0.
> > >
> > > Erm. That's very confusing isn't it. Sorry.
> > >
> > > The actual reason for being against your reasoning on the
> > > reflect.* 1.3 stuff, was that there's nice 1.4 stuff as well that 
> > > exceptions.* could link to, so where do we stop?
> > >
> > > Hen
> > >
> > > On Wed, 10 Jul 2002, Scott Sanders wrote:
> > >
> > > > > Yeah, I'm -1 Scott's complaint.
> > > >
> > > > Henry, what do you mean by this?  I am just wondering.
> > > >
> > > > Scott
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > <mailto:commons-dev-> unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> > > For
> > > additional commands,
> > > e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> <mailto:commons-dev-> unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> > For 
> additional commands, 
> e-mail: 
> > <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
> >
> >
> 
> 
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   
> <mailto:commons-dev-> unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
> For 
> additional commands, 
> e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>
> 
> 

--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:commons-dev-unsubscribe@jakarta.apache.org>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:commons-dev-help@jakarta.apache.org>


Mime
View raw message