commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From robert burrell donkin <>
Subject Re: [Jelly] Pressing on with core release
Date Tue, 18 Feb 2003 22:48:51 GMT
On Tuesday, February 18, 2003, at 10:11 PM, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote:

> On Tuesday, February 18, 2003, at 03:25 PM, Morgan Delagrange wrote:
>> Hey all,
>> So, what's the next step?  I think we need to fix or
>> at least document the remaining bugs, maybe figure out
>> how to structure the distribution.  Should we do an
>> official beta release now, or should we skip that step
>> and go right to RC?
>> My only big release concern at the moment is the state
>> of our dependencies.  Some of those dependencies (e.g.
>> Jexl) look like they are early beta.  Is it OK to
>> release Jelly with some beta dependencies, and if not
>> what are we going to do about it?
> I'm working on the big problems in Jexl now - I would think that you have 
> to just go with it as beta until they are resolved.

i think that it'd be ok to go with a jexl beta providing that it was a 
proper beta release rather than just a SNAPSHOT.

on the subject of dependencies, i've just finished beanutils 1.6.1 which 
(hopefully) should work ok with jelly and so you shouldn't need to rely on 
a beanutils SNAPSHOT.

- robert

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message