commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From robert burrell donkin <>
Subject Re: [Jelly] Pressing on with core release
Date Wed, 19 Feb 2003 17:48:22 GMT
On Wednesday, February 19, 2003, at 05:09 PM, Morgan Delagrange wrote:

> --- robert burrell donkin
> <> wrote:
> <snip/>
>> i think that it'd be ok to go with a jexl beta
>> providing that it was a
>> proper beta release rather than just a SNAPSHOT.
> It's probably ok, as long as the Java API is stable
> and the expression syntax is mostly stable.

if it isn't stable, then go for an alpha :)

>> on the subject of dependencies, i've just finished
>> beanutils 1.6.1 which
>> (hopefully) should work ok with jelly and so you
>> shouldn't need to rely on
>> a beanutils SNAPSHOT.
> Shouldn't be a problem.  We're already using BeanUtils
> 1.6 in the Maven build and it works fine.  GUMP also
> seems happy with the HEAD.

there is a subtle bug in 1.6 involving dynabeans (i think) that dIon 
reported and which impacts jelly and maven. this bug i fixed in 1.6.1 and 
is a major reason why it was released.

- robert

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message