commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
Subject Re: [Graph2] nsUML license problem
Date Thu, 06 Feb 2003 01:33:36 GMT
Morgan Delagrange <> wrote on 06/02/2003 11:28:55 AM:

> --- wrote:
> > There is a third option:
> > 
> > 3) Remove graph2 from commons.
> I wouldn't presume to do that on my own recognizance,
> but if all the graph2 developers decided to go that
> way, that would be fine.  Seems like overkill for the
> sake of two classes, but I have no idea how important
> they are to Maven or other dependant projects not
> tracked by GUMP.  Removing graph2 from Commons still
> may mean that it can't be used in other Jakarta
> software, depending on how the board decides to
> interpret the LGPL and viral licensing.
> Don't shoot the messenger, I don't care one whit about
> the holy wars.  In fact, the only reason I know what
> license nsUML uses is because last week I researched
> the project so I could have an informed opinion on how
> to fix the GUMP build for graph, so we could make some
> progress on Maven nightlies.

Hey, I'm not shooting anybody, I'm just making sure we cover all options.


> This is me being proactive.
And it works for me. I like proactive. We just need to keep our minds 
clear about what our options are.
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message