commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Stephen Colebourne" <>
Subject Re: [lang] 2.0 left to do
Date Fri, 15 Aug 2003 08:13:00 GMT
A comment of a method, and its time to go RC2.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Phil Steitz" <>
>   +1 to yanking the time code to address #22172
>   +1 to applying Pete's javadoc patch if we have it in the next day or 
> two, but otherwise calling it quits for 2.0.  Sure, we could keep 
> refining tests and javadoc, but I think that the consensus is that we 
> are in pretty good shape for the stuff that is going to be released.  I 
> at least am happy with all of the stuff that I have reviewed/contributed 
> to.  The only packages that I have not looked at carefully are builder 
> and enum.  I notice some test path coverage gaps in exception, but the 
> key stuff appears to be well tested and if others have confidence in the 
> code, I am +1 for release as is.
> Not sure exactly what to do about #22393.  I posted a comment pointing 
> out that serialization of Nestable is actually tested in 
> NestableExceptionTestCase and asking for sample code.
> Phil
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message