commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From robert burrell donkin <>
Subject Re: [all] STATUS.html vs. Maven xdocs
Date Sun, 21 Sep 2003 19:40:58 GMT
1. not all components are mavenized.

2. STATUS.html files are mandated by our charter so probably we'd need a 
vote to remove them completely. the main purpose of the STATUS file is to 
keep track of which committers are involved with that particular component.

- robert

On Sunday, September 21, 2003, at 07:16 PM, __matthewHawthorne wrote:

> With the acceptance of Maven as a build system, hasn't the use of STATUS.
> html to maintain lists of developers and tasks become outdated?
> It seems more desirable to keep the list of developers in the project.xml 
> to be displayed on the site, and also to create a xdocs/tasks.xml (or 
> something similar) to keep track of action items.
> This way, everything you ever wanted to know about a project is in the 
> Maven site documentation.
> Is there any particular reason to continue the maintenence of STATUS.html 
> files?
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message