commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Craig R. McClanahan" <>
Subject Re: [resources] status was (Re: [lang] i18n package proposal)
Date Thu, 29 Jan 2004 07:28:38 GMT
Quoting Martin Cooper <>:

> On Wed, 28 Jan 2004, Mark R. Diggory wrote:
> > Ask those developing it for a status.
> >
> > Resources developers, what is the status of resources, how close are you
> > to releasing?
> It's partly my fault, I suspect, that it isn't further down the pike.
> That's because the last time the promote/release discussion came up, I
> griped that some refactoring was needed. Unfortunately, it turns out that
> I was mistaken, since some refactoring had happened without my noticing,
> but the discussion faded out at that point anyway.
> So, I think we're actually pretty close to pushing this forward. If the
> other Resources committers agree, I'd be happy to shoot for promotion to
> Commons Proper, at which point people could at least start working against
> nightly builds, while we tie up the loose ends and get a 1.0 release out
> the door.
> How does that sound, to committers and non-committers alike?


Before a real 1.0 release I would really like to see a JDBC based implementation
added, but that doesn't need to be a gating factor for promotion to commons
proper (especially if I don't have time to work on it, although it's becoming
possible that I might :-).

> --
> Martin Cooper


To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message