commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Stephen Colebourne" <>
Subject Re: [lang] Re: Review for 2.1
Date Fri, 15 Oct 2004 23:27:38 GMT
I agree. I've committed significant changes to DurationFormatUtils, so
people should check that out.

I'll run through outstanding things again tomorrow if possible, and then we
should consider an RC1.

Its not that all the text package is bad, its just that it needs adding to
and manipulating into a unified whole. I'm working on this at the moment,
but don't want to hold up 2.1 for it.


----- Original Message -----
From: "Gary Gregory" <>
> > My thought is maybe we can do a release soon without the text
> subpackage?

IMHO, release early and release often (a la XP). We could perhaps agree
that version 2.2's main goal would be to release the text package.

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message