commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Graham <>
Subject Re: [validator] bug id 30686
Date Mon, 11 Oct 2004 04:43:22 GMT
There isn't a javascript url validation yet.  I'm not concerned at all
about the performance of the regex.  We just need it to work in all cases
and tune it if there's a performance problem later.


--- Tim Reilly <> wrote:

> > Have you used the proposed patch for your projects?
> No. I was evaluating validator or really just a handful of classes
> from validator when I stumbled upon my basic test case failing.
> Instead of just filing a bug I decided to track it down, and sent
> patches too!
> >  I can take some time
> > this week to look at it.
> Great. I know I sounded unconfident about the patch, actually its that
> I'm not confident that with the addition of * its most efficient
> regular expression. I know little to nothing about how regex engines
> reduce the expressions and evaluate them. But I'm confident regarding
> the addition of 'zero or more' clause from Martin's comments and also
> looking at the spec Martin referenced. Also the thoroughness of the
> test cases.
> I'll integrate this class into my project (why not.) I'm still not
> finding where the js counter-part for this lives?
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> For additional commands, e-mail:

Do you Yahoo!?
Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today!

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message