commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Henning P. Schmiedehausen" <>
Subject Re: [Configuration] VectorSupport for Configuration
Date Mon, 18 Oct 2004 20:29:17 GMT
"Eric Pugh" <> writes:

>I think we should remove the Vector support now that we are past 1.0.
>Should we add a VectorConfiguration class that decorates a regular
>Configuration and adds in the Vector methods?

Yep, nuke it!

>Or just not worry about it?  Alternatively, should a VectorConfiguration
>live in the Turbine 2.3 source tree?

Turbine 2.x (x > 3) will solely use getList(). I was just worrying
about current Turbine 2.x (x <= 3) users that want to upgrade their
application dependencies from mumble-SNAPSHOT to 1.0 and suddently
find methods gone. The 1.0 release avoids this and for 1.1, we will be
better off without getVector().


Dipl.-Inf. (Univ.) Henning P. Schmiedehausen          INTERMETA GmbH        +49 9131 50 654 0

RedHat Certified Engineer -- Jakarta Turbine Development  -- hero for hire
   Linux, Java, perl, Solaris -- Consulting, Training, Development

"Fighting for one's political stand is an honorable action, but re-
 fusing to acknowledge that there might be weaknesses in one's
 position - in order to identify them so that they can be remedied -
 is a large enough problem with the Open Source movement that it
 deserves to be on this list of the top five problems."
                       -- Michelle Levesque, "Fundamental Issues with
                                    Open Source Software Development"

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message