commons-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ceki Gülcü <>
Subject Re: [logging] Enterprise Common Logging... dare we say 2.0?
Date Mon, 03 Jan 2005 17:03:08 GMT
At 05:53 PM 1/3/2005, robert burrell donkin wrote:

>nope (but don't ask me to find the references). distributing an api jar 
>which requires runtime dependencies was a mistake. this issue hasn't 
>arisen for quite a while since we try to keep quiet about the existing of 
>the api jar.

I do not understand. How can JCL *not* require runtime dependencies given 
that it is a wrapper around various logging APIs? In other words, how can 
JCL wrap API x without runtime dependencies on API x?

>- robert

Ceki Gülcü

   The complete log4j manual:

To unsubscribe, e-mail:
For additional commands, e-mail:

View raw message